Steinbecks The Grapes of Wrath vs. Sinclair’s The Jungle Essay

Steinbecks The Grapes of vexation vs. Sinclairs The jungle The global appeal of the so-called American dream of cheer and success has drawn many people to the promised land for hundreds of years. Although the American regime preached equality for all on paper, it was driven primarily by money. both Upton Sinclair and John Steinbeck recognized this and used literature to convey the flaws of capitalism. Sinclairs The Jungle satirized Americas wage slavery at the turn of the cytosine and forty years later, Steinbecks novel The Grapes of Wrath criticized the commercialism of American tillage. These two books, often viewed as propagandistic, employ similar persuasive strategies square imagery, heavy symbolism, biting irony, and a proposal to correct the situation. Despite these parallels, however, the regular(a) diction and syntax of Steinbecks writing deviates from the inconsistent style of Sinclair. afterward considering how each author manipulates various stylistic eleme nts, The Grapes of Wrath proves to be a more cogent tract.The most obvious rhetorical device in The Jungle is its powerful imagery. Sinclair offers repulsive anecdotes of work in the packinghouses. His description of the putting to death beds in winter vividly lingers in the mind of the reader. During winter, Sinclair says, the vicious cool of the beds caused the men to tie up their feet in newspapers and old sacks. By the halt of the day, the frozen blood of slaughtered cattle soaked through their improvised boots so that a man would be walking on great lumps the coat of the feet of an elephant. Sinclair also claims that when workers fell into the open vats on the floor in storage tank rooms full of steam, their absence passed unnoticed, often over... ...beck describes them. Because the family concentrated on farming instead of schooling, their country phrases are fitting. Steinbecks convincing portrayal of detritus Bowl migrants grabs the readers emotions, producing a compelling argument. Overall, The Grapes of Wrath proves to be a more effective novel that The Jungle. Although The Jungle shares some of the same(p) rhetorical devices, its unrealistic dialogue and long-winded sentences detract from its potency. Steinbeck and Sinclair both successfully use imagery, symbolism, and irony to persuade their audience. In both books, various symbols underline the deceptive nature of the American dream, and irony mercilessly illuminates the unjust aspects of capitalism. Ultimately, however, because The Grapes of Wrath is so genuine, Steinbeck proposes a solution for crooked capitalism more successfully than Sinclair.