Do you agree with the view that the Beatles “changed the world in the sixties”? Essay

Its clear from any angle that The Beatles had an incredible furbish up on the universe of discourse in the mid-mid-sixties, but I think its evident stating they changed the gentlemans gentleman is vent too far, and in actual item they merely reflected a changing gentleman. seminal fluid 18 mentions the impression that The Beatles changed the beingness in the sixties, and it references to approximately of the contemporary debates from the decade, which the four-man skirt had an influence on legalization of drugs, the war in Vietnam and traditional and alternate religions.Ian Inglis excessively declargons them as one(a) of the 20th centurys to a enormouser extent(prenominal) than signifi stopt achievements which is true to an extent some of their views and actions on the decades disputes were eye-openers to society. Although, denotation 18 also makes the comment that the bind are innovators, which is giveed by source 17s view theyre not the architects of the bracing jejuneness destination. This shows it the counter list they flaccid a shifting cosmea and society.To say the Beatles changed the world in the sixties holds some truth they were the first band to speak out close the Vietnam war, the first band to openly experiment with alternate religions and criticize otherwise traditional faiths and the only band to publically call for the legalization of marijuana. So source 18s view that the four men were heavy(p) across a wide range of categories including historical, sociological, ethnic and musical and that their opinions were sought- aft(prenominal)(a) out, heard and acted on is obviously evident especially when relating to the bands objections over against the Vietnam fight.Perhaps one of the bands most far-famed demonstrations, in 1965, sent shock waves through the rural area the Beatles were the first band to be honored with the nations juicyest award, but Lennon rejected his to protest against Britains involve ment in the war with Vietnam. He also coined the historied phrases make love not war and give peace a chance.Its obviously apparent that the band fathomd and regu youthful some of the strongest protests against the cruel war they helped to expose to society how bad the part was in Vietnam, giving the conflict details higher sense than before. Without their high profile protests, its hard to sayhow the population would have reacted to the affright circumstances of the war, but the Beatles gave them a route to take, they functiond the population to support their view against conflict and unnecessary deaths, on that pointfore this argues that the band changed the world to misrepresent their opinions.Supporting this is the negativity in source 16,Lennon says the resembling idiots are path everything his insulting oral communication, aimed at the political relation, are haveable considering the war is still real in 1971 when the statement is do, hes angry at the haggard fighting and deaths- much like the rest of the population.The Beatles involvement with alternate religions make headlines and influenced a higher awareness in the world t presentfore this could also argue the view that they changed the world. Indian Mysticism and Transcendental Meditation were ii of the faiths they experimented with, however it was their dismissal of the Christian/Catholic belief that was the bigger impact source 18 supports the idea they made significant achievements in the cultural category. George Harrison was the first member of the band to experiment with a new religion Hinduism which he took interest in after being hand a book on reincarnation during the filming of Help in 1965, the other members shortly followed suit.Their extracts to explore other faiths and cultures became high profile and famous decisions 65 reporters followed the four men when they travelled to India in February 1968, where they advanced in meditation classes and followed the Mahari shi Mahesh Yogi religion. only of this was new and exciting or shocking to westerly civilization no one of high status had entere horrendous things like this and therefore it further the more rebellious youth culture to change.Not only did their views on alternate religions make headlines, so did their opinions on traditional faiths. August 1964, the Beatles press officer said the band were so anti-Christ they shock me which isnt an easy thing this opinion is furthered by Lennons 1970 song God in which he sings I dont cogitate in Jesus and I dont believe in Bible.Also notice the lyrics his 1970 song Imagine, imagine theres no heaven no hell below us no religion too. The sixties was still a snip where traditional faith was strong, muckle went to church every Sunday and the hind durationnce pillwas only legalized in 1961 so for the four men to openly express theyre non-believers, it was shocking. New youth culture would have operaten it as an escape to live life with more freedom, as the older and preadolescent generation gap was wider than ever young people looked up to the band as idols.The famous four lead this contemporary debate more than other factors did they helped to shape a new younger religious culture, support by source 17, they made new religion and dismissal of the traditional instantly chic for the millions of fans who looked to the group for charge.Furthermore, the Beatles drug use was continuously in the press during the sixties a time where the world learnt more and more well-nigh different pills, inhalants and injections. Source 18 states that the Beatles opinions on the legalization of drugs were sought out, heard and acted on particularly in 1967 when the four young men called for the legalization of marijuana through an advertisement in The Times.This was a big thing it was a fairly new drugs in UK and American culture, before the sixties tobacco and alcohol were the only general drugs. Although their excuse didnt wo rk, the advertisement still framed higher awareness of the hallucinogenic drug, which encouraged more people to try or use it. In 2004, capital of Minnesota McCartney admitted they used drugs as an influence to most of their music including Got to Get You in my Life which was about cannabis and confessed the infamous suspicion that Lucy in the riffle with Diamonds was about LSD. By the late sixties the band had managed to change how the youth spent their time the younger generations now started to hang out in private open areas, listening to their psychedelic rock, growing their hair long, get dressed in colourful clothes and taking mind-altering drugs the hippie era had begun.Although, it seems to me, its more evident that the Beatles didnt change the world in the sixties, but in fact they merely reflected a changing world this opinion is supported by both source 17 and 18. Its stated by Allan Kozinn in source 17 that although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth c ulture, they were by no means its architects which is also supported in source 18 by the comprehension of the words innovators and spokesperson these words infer that the four men were imitating originalviews and opinions.Source 16 also agrees with this opinion to an extent Lennon often had a controversial provenance when talk of the town to the media or the press, in this instance he would be saying its still the same society and world, yet the midriff class people follow our stupid government agencys which refers to the its merely the same, the bourgeois system and we dressed up comments.Also with Lennons statement we have to consider that in 1971 the band had split this is the same year as the statement was made therefore its going to be negative.Source 17 states that the Beatles had the ability to detect trends wee and made them instantly chic for millions of fans I think its evident this was the guinea pig for their involvement in the protests against the Vietnam War .The four young men didnt create the anti-war views and opinions, they already existed among millions of people considering the UK was only in effect(p) getting better after World War 2, the men simply gave the ideas a louder voice, they catalyzed the protests into the media so large amounts of people would see and agree. In an interview with Lennon and McCartney, in 1968, they were asked, the US has been plagued by the Vietnam War, and the world has been concerned, whats your views? in which Lennon replied, its another piece of insanity. In the question we can understand that the rest of the world had the same views as the Beatles did, the four men are repeating the views to create higher awareness and support evidence of media manipulation.Two age earlier, during a press multitude in New York, George Harrison made a similar reply to a similar question its just war is wrong and its obvious its wrong using the word obvious shows that he knows its a widespread opinion.Through a ll of this we can see that the band werent alone on their views and opinions in fact I think that most of their ideas they will have heard before from their elders. They use their best-selling(predicate)ity and status to showcase the concerns the public have had for many years, the issue of the Vietnam War is horrifying and disturbing to many of the younger and older generations most people would want a stop to it straight away, source 18 supports this rock through the words innovators and spokespersons.Arguing this even further is their 1968 song regeneration which includes the lyrics we all want to change the world, you tell me thats evolution, this inclusion of the words we andyou makes it sound like their voicing the we as the population (including themselves) and the you is the government/constitutions. Musical influences and voices are used again by Lennon in 1971 in his song Imagine imagine theres no countries zippo to kill or die for imagine all the people life senten ce in peace. I dont think it can be said the Beatles changed the worlds opinion on the Vietnam war here its evident that they all have the same view and they simply gave it media coverage and a larger voice due to their popularity.Again, the argument is strengthened by the fact the Beatles religious views didnt become widespread, nor did they put down them to the UK in the first place their alternate religions and the high profile reports about these different faiths were not the initial introduction of them into British society. Since amendments were made to the British Nationality law in the 1940s, people from the commonwealth islands (including India) had been immigrating to the UK for nearly 20 years this meant that people of the Hindu and other religions had already introduced these faiths into British society and the world was already changing to be more cultural before the Beatles choice to follow them.The band only created higher popularity for these faiths amongst the p opulation. Also their views on Christianity and universality werent widely accepted 1966 John Lennon made the statement the Beatles were more popular than Jesus which created uproar in America, especially in the in the south that are strong Catholics. Younger generations burned all their merchandise and refused to accept the band as role models again. There was no change here taken place, only rejection of the new which opposes sources 17 and 18. However source 16 does support this the whole bourgeois system is exactly the same, Lennon recognizes that they didnt change the world due to religious or other issues. scorn this, the view that they reflected a changing world is once more reenforce by their drug use mentioned in source 18, which before seemed to be solely created by them but according to Paul McCartney, they were introduced to drugs, before they became famous, whilst they were in Hamburg. He stated, in 2004, that they felt everyone was doing them and they were told to inhale this, but it did nothing for me when talking aboutBenzedrine.This tells us that it wasnt the Beatles who initiated drug use, but in fact others introduced them to it. Also, relating back to the legalization of marijuana advertisement, we have to consider that it also had signatures from sixty-four other celebrities, including the Rolling Stones who were infamous for their drug and alcohol use, which suggests it was a widespread movement not a singular band who lead the way into the psychedelic era. The wheels of the hippie period had started turning, originating in America in the early sixties, a long time before the Beatles arrived on the drug scene. seemingly America influenced the Beatles into taking the harder drugs, such as LSD, not visa versa, just the bands music, media coverage and opinions expressed the issue with hallucinogenic drugs more than theyd been dealt with before.All in all, I think although it could be argued that the Beatles changed the world in the sixt ies they created leading protests against the Vietnam War, they introduced new religions to the younger generations, they were brave enough to announce their dis-belief in the tradition faiths and created the start of the psychedelic era all of which received great support from the new youth culture. Source 18 supports this thoroughly the Beatles changed the world in the sixties twentieth century significant achievement, source 17 also upkeeps the argument instantly chic for millions of fans who looked to the group for guidance.But, its evident that the four mens involvement with the Vietnam War protests were only echoing the publics opinions, that drug use was popular before the band became famous and their religious views didnt have an pretend on the world the Beatles only followed the crowd and their status expressed the issues. Which is again supported through both source 17 and 18 although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth culture, they were by no means its arc hitects, innovators and spokespersons.In conclusion I think you can see the shifting world influenced the Beatles views and opinions and it was their famous status that seemed to express new ideas to the youth and society they garner their anti-war, alternate religions and drug use by things they experienced happening in the moving world of the sixties. Source 16 also disagrees with the statement that the Beatles changed the world in the sixties, Lennon says, nothing happened, that the world wasexactly the same and the band dressed up.Despite it seems hes recognizing no change, he does notice the four men had a slight influence lower-middle-class with long hair, their trademark look was popular which they had adopted from the late 50s mod fashion and the changing hippie fashions. In conclusion, I dont think the Beatles changed the world in the sixties, I think its evident that the band merely reflected the changing world, giving it a louder voice due to their famous status.